Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106-114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n=42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone. RESULTS: A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18-56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15-44] in patients with MTX (P=0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7±12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4±8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542-16.184; P=0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR. CONCLUSIONS: These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.

Effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis / Efecto del tratamiento combinado con prednisona y metotrexato versus prednisona sola sobre los parámetros de laboratorio en arteritis de células gigantes

Objective: To compare the effect of combined treatment with prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) versus prednisone alone over laboratory parameters in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Patients and methods: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial about usefulness of treatment with prednisone and MTX versus prednisone and placebo in GCA (Ann Intern Med 2001;134:106–114). As a part of follow-up of patients (n=42), we performed laboratory analysis in 20 time points during the two-year period of follow-up. To analyze differences, we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, and platelets, and compared the results in both groups adjusting by time of follow-up, existence of relapses and dose of prednisone. Results: A total of 724 laboratory measurements were done. Median value of ESR was 33 [18–56] in patients with placebo and 26 [15–44] in patients with MTX (P=0.0002). No significant differences were observed in ESR during relapses. The mean ESR value followed a parallel course in both groups, but was lower in the group with MTX than in the group with placebo in 18 of 20 time points of follow-up. The AUC of ESR by time of follow-up was 28,461.7±12,326 in the group with placebo and 19,598.4±8,117 in the group with MTX (mean difference 8,863, 95% CI 1.542–16.184; P=0.019). The course of other laboratory parameters paralleled, without statistical significance, those observed for ESR. Conclusions: These data, along with clinical data, suggest that MTX might play a role as a disease-modifying agent in the treatment of GCA.(AU)

Objetivo: Comparar el efecto del tratamiento combinado con prednisona y metotrexato (MTX) versus prednisona sola sobre parámetros de laboratorio en arteritis de células gigantes (ACG). Pacientes y métodos: Realizamos un ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo sobre la utilidad del tratamiento con prednisona y MTX frente a prednisona y placebo en la ACG (Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:106-114). Como parte del seguimiento de los pacientes (n=42), realizamos análisis de laboratorio en 20 puntos temporales durante el período de seguimiento de 2 años. Para analizar diferencias calculamos el área bajo la curva (AUC) de VSG, hemoglobina y plaquetas, y comparamos los resultados en ambos grupos ajustando por tiempo de seguimiento, existencia de recaídas y dosis de prednisona. Resultados: Se realizaron un total de 724 mediciones de laboratorio. El valor medio de la VSG fue de 33 (18-56) en pacientes con placebo y de 26 (15-44) en pacientes con MTX (p=0,0002). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la VSG durante las recaídas. El valor medio de la VSG siguió un curso paralelo en ambos grupos, pero fue menor en el grupo con MTX que en el grupo con placebo en 18 de 20 puntos temporales de seguimiento. El AUC de la VSG por tiempo de seguimiento fue de 28.461,7±12.326 en el grupo con placebo y de 19.598,4±8.117 en el grupo con MTX (diferencia de medias 8.863; IC 95%: 1.542-16.184; p=0,019). La evolución de los demás parámetros de laboratorio fue paralela, sin significación estadística, a la observada para la VSG. Conclusiones: Estos datos, junto con los datos clínicos, sugieren que el MTX podría desempeñar un papel como agente modificador de la enfermedad en el tratamiento de la ACG.(AU)

Therapeutic Response After Immunosuppressive Drug Prescription in Non-infectious Uveitis: A Survival Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To identify factors affecting the response rate to immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included patients from the Hospital Clinico San Carlos Uveitis Clinic diagnosed with NIU from 1992 to 2016. Subjects were followed up from ISD prescription until the achievement of good therapeutic response (GTR), ISD treatment change, or up to 12 months. GTR was defined as the complete resolution of the eye inflammatory manifestations with a corticosteroid dose ≤ 10 or ≤ 5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (GTR10 and GTR5, respectively) maintained for at least 28 days. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for GTR. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors were analyzed using Cox robust regression. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients (100 episodes of ISD prescription) were analyzed. In 44 and 41 episodes, GTR10 and GTR5 were achieved, respectively. A lower hazard for both GTRs was associated with uveitic macular edema at prescription and with a higher "highest oral corticosteroid dose prescribed in the year before ISD prescription". GTR10 was higher if cyclosporine was prescribed (compared to other ISDs), and if a higher number of ISDs had been previously prescribed. GTR5 hazard was lower for patients with posterior uveitis or if the ISDs were prescribed before 2008, and higher if periocular corticosteroids had been administered before ISD prescription, or if the duration of the posterior segment activity was shorter. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with GTR to ISDs may help to identify patients with NIUs who could benefit from a thorough follow-up.